Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cameron Smith's avatar

The difficulty with peer review may be finding independent voices willing to voice criticism. If it’s intended to be private, kept within trusted circles and for the benefit of creators, then I can see that working. If it’s intended to be public and help generate interest and potential audience, then reviews would probably end up being unrealistically positive.

Feature articles giving more information and context to new shows would be less of a problem. Not sure how much of a readership there would be for that sort of thing. It would be quite niche. I mean, I’d read them. Heck, I’d even write them! But I wouldn’t like to count myself as typical in this regard.

And, sadly, I suspect that you're absolutely correct not to rely on British theatre critics to do any of these things.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Yeoh's avatar

In the early days of theatre blogging (of which there’s a book documenting this now, and of which I was a small part) this is what started to happen (although not so much in musicals) - and IIRC you really tried to go to a show in its first week before any reviews anyway, form your own opinion and then either tell it to the creators if you knew them or blogged about it. It’s possible this could flourish again either via blog or podcast or even videocast, but for lots of reasons (I think maybe tied into the money and energy of the sector at the moment but it’s complex) I’m not sure it will happen. Excellent idea though. (Cf. Eg New economics papers are discussed via blog or Twitter etc. quite extensively as people try to form opinions…).

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts